JurídicoESEN
Order (Auto)April 21, 2016

A- de 2016

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Jorge Ignacio Pretelt Chaljub

✓Claimant Jose Alfonso Caballero Y Otros

01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

1 topic · 1 subtopic · source: case-law reporter's topic index
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)

Recurso de súplica interpuesto en contra del auto que rechazó la demanda de la referencia, por haberse configurado la cosa juzgada constitucional.

El magistrado sustanciador adoptó la anterior decisión, tras advertir que la Corporación en la Sentencia C-073/10, declaró la exequibilidad de la norma acusada en dicha oportunidad, la cual coincide con la presentada en la actualidad.

La Sala Plena verifica que el recurso se presentó de manera extemporánea y por ello decide RECHAZARLO. 200

Case-law reporter's text · normalized for reading (all caps → sentence case)
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. Primero. RECHAZAR por extemporaneo el recurso de suplica presentado por los senores Jose Alfonso Caballero Soto, Jose Antonio Sabogal Biuche, Juan Carlos Torres Ospina, Aldemar Alvarez Marin, Victor Emilio Sierra y Daniel Guevara Abonce.
  2. Segundo. COMUNICAR el contenido de esta decision al recurrente, informandole que contra la misma no procede recurso alguno.
  3. Tercero. ARCHIVESE el expediente.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

Cites0
It cites no recorded decisions.
Cited by0
No decision cites it yet.

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.